Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Slavin v. Parnell

Дата публикации: 04-09-2026 13:00:20

The court should block the Pentagon from firing Stars and Stripes employees in retaliation for their speech.
The post Slavin v. Parnell appeared first on The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.


Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Date Filed: Sept. 3, 2026

Background: In August 2026, the Department of Defense sought to fire three Stars and Stripes employees — its publisher, Max Lederer; its editor-in-chief, Erik Slavin; and one of its reporters, Lara Korte — citing their public statements against planned changes to Stripes’ operations, including threats to its editorial independence.

The proposed terminations came shortly after Stripes published a report about deteriorating conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln.

Lederer, Slavin, and Korte sued and asked a court for an emergency order blocking the government from proceeding with the terminations, arguing the government is retaliating against the employees for their protected speech.   

Our Position: In a friend-of-the-court brief, Reporters Committee is urging the court to grant the employees’ request for a preliminary injunction.

  • The government’s actions in this case pose a threat to the historical independence of a news outlet that publishes stories of interest to the U.S. military community.

From the Brief: “The Department [of Defense] has impermissibly attempted to interfere with Stripes’ editorial judgment by threatening terminations of its employees based on their speech, and after Stripes published an important story about the conditions on the U.S.S. Lincoln. Such interference by the Department — especially given Stripes’ journalism on matters of great concern to the public and U.S. servicemembers — is not in keeping with First Amendment values.”

Update: On Sept. 4, 2026, U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden denied the employees’ request for a preliminary injunction.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Reporters Committee statement on White House banning CNN, MS NOW, Politico06.4318-09-2026
2 Comment on DHS likely violated Rochester man’s free-speech rights, court rules by Thomas Janowski 09.2319-09-2026
3RCFP urges federal district court in Pennsylvania to lift restrictions on accessing immigration records05.6218-02-2026
4FCC’s threats to ABC licenses ‘pose a grave danger’ to democracy06.4318-09-2026
5New York Times accuses agency of political retaliation in countersuit over discrimination case0710-07-2026
6A new OPM rule will expand how federal agencies make workforce decisions0510-07-2026
7Memphis judge blocks juvenile court from unlawfully shutting reporters out of proceedings06.1209-07-2026
8Appeals court reverses order requiring removed signs to be restored at National Park sites0502-07-2026
9I Don’t Like Flock Cameras, but I Don’t Think They’re Unconstitutional011.1628-08-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 9.83. Источник: www.rcfp.org.