The Supreme Court rejected the Centre's plea regarding private complaints in fraud cases. Special courts cannot take cognisance of such complaints filed under the Companies Act. The court allowed the Centre to authorize officers to file complaints in these matters. This ruling ensures further scrutiny before fraud allegations are considered. The decision stemmed from a case involving former directors of Shreemukh Namitha Homes.
New Delhi: The apex court on Monday rejected the Centre's plea seeking a review of its January ruling that special courts cannot take cognisance of private complaints in fraud cases filed under the Companies Act.
A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, however, gave the Centre liberty to invoke its powers under the Companies Act and authorise any officer to file the complaint in such cases.
On January 9, the Supreme Court held that in cases under Section 447 (which deals with fraud) of the Companies Act, the complaint must be made by the director of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office or an officer authorised by the government. "This adds a further level of scrutiny and investigation prior to taking cognisance in cases where allegations of fraud are made and ensures that cognisance is not taken by the special court simply upon filing of a private complaint," it had held.
The court said Section 448, which concerns false statements, could not be read in isolation since the punishment prescribed for the offence is linked to Section 447. The issue was related to a private complaint filed against former directors of Shreemukh Namitha Homes.
Also Read: Govt taking steps to build harmonised data infrastructure: MoSPI Secretary
The complaint alleged that one of the former directors convened an extraordinary general meeting of the company in 2021 without authority, appointed third parties as directors, fabricated board and shareholder resolutions, and made statutory filings along with other forged and false documents on the website of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SC refuses to stay Bombay HC order quashing Rs 3,300 crore one-time spectrum charge on telcos | 0 | 10.96 | 07-08-2026 |
| 2 | Reliance Industries says Rs 10 lakh Supreme Court order in NTPC gas case was ‘costs’, not fine | 0 | 6.41 | 18-08-2026 |
| 3 | Внутрикорпоративный спор едва не довел компанию до банкротства | 0 | 7.6 | 21-08-2026 |
| 4 | Суд отказал в прекращении уголовного дела против Чемезовой | 0 | 5 | 28-04-2026 |
| 5 | NBCC moves Supreme Court over RERA rules for 16 Supertech projects | 0 | 7.22 | 17-08-2026 |
| 6 | SC nudges Centre to amend Highways Act, wants judicial officers deciding land compensation disputes, not bureaucrats | 0 | 4.94 | 23-07-2026 |
| 7 | SC seeks CCI response in Kerala State Beverages Corp case | 0 | 7.85 | 13-08-2026 |
| 8 | Верховный суд признал незаконным запрос приставов оператору о звонках коллекторов | 0 | 0 | 07-11-2018 |
| 9 | Delhi High Court dismisses plea seeking review of Parliament security framework | 0 | 5.04 | 06-08-2026 |