Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Supreme Court rejects Centre's plea on private complaints in Companies Act fraud cases

Дата публикации: 21-09-2026 19:24:28

The Supreme Court rejected the Centre's plea regarding private complaints in fraud cases. Special courts cannot take cognisance of such complaints filed under the Companies Act. The court allowed the Centre to authorize officers to file complaints in these matters. This ruling ensures further scrutiny before fraud allegations are considered. The decision stemmed from a case involving former directors of Shreemukh Namitha Homes.

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

New Delhi: The apex court on Monday rejected the Centre's plea seeking a review of its January ruling that special courts cannot take cognisance of private complaints in fraud cases filed under the Companies Act.

A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, however, gave the Centre liberty to invoke its powers under the Companies Act and authorise any officer to file the complaint in such cases.

Also Read: FM Nirmala Sitharaman clarifies UPI MDR charges won't affect consumers, hits out at opposition over misinformation

On January 9, the Supreme Court held that in cases under Section 447 (which deals with fraud) of the Companies Act, the complaint must be made by the director of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office or an officer authorised by the government. "This adds a further level of scrutiny and investigation prior to taking cognisance in cases where allegations of fraud are made and ensures that cognisance is not taken by the special court simply upon filing of a private complaint," it had held.

The court said Section 448, which concerns false statements, could not be read in isolation since the punishment prescribed for the offence is linked to Section 447. The issue was related to a private complaint filed against former directors of Shreemukh Namitha Homes.

Also Read: Govt taking steps to build harmonised data infrastructure: MoSPI Secretary

The complaint alleged that one of the former directors convened an extraordinary general meeting of the company in 2021 without authority, appointed third parties as directors, fabricated board and shareholder resolutions, and made statutory filings along with other forged and false documents on the website of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1SC refuses to stay Bombay HC order quashing Rs 3,300 crore one-time spectrum charge on telcos 010.9607-08-2026
2Reliance Industries says Rs 10 lakh Supreme Court order in NTPC gas case was ‘costs’, not fine 06.4118-08-2026
3Внутрикорпоративный спор едва не довел компанию до банкротства07.621-08-2026
4Суд отказал в прекращении уголовного дела против Чемезовой0528-04-2026
5NBCC moves Supreme Court over RERA rules for 16 Supertech projects 07.2217-08-2026
6SC nudges Centre to amend Highways Act, wants judicial officers deciding land compensation disputes, not bureaucrats 04.9423-07-2026
7SC seeks CCI response in Kerala State Beverages Corp case 07.8513-08-2026
8Верховный суд признал незаконным запрос приставов оператору о звонках коллекторов0007-11-2018
9Delhi High Court dismisses plea seeking review of Parliament security framework05.0406-08-2026

Классификация: Происшествия. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 9. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 4.86. Источник: economictimes.indiatimes.com.