Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Delhi High Court rejects anticipatory bail plea of YouTuber Ajeet Bharti in SC/ST Act case

Дата публикации: 24-09-2026 11:06:27

Delhi High Court said a prima facie case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was made out against YouTuber Ajeet Bharti and noted that the legislation imposes a statutory bar on granting pre-arrest bail in such cases

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

The FIR has been registered under provisions of the SC/ST Act, the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

The FIR has been registered under provisions of the SC/ST Act, the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Delhi High Court on Thursday (September 24, 2026) dismissed YouTuber Ajeet Bharti’s plea seeking anticipatory bail in a case concerning alleged casteist remarks against Nagina MP Chandrashekhar Azad.

Justice Saurabh Banerjee said a prima facie case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was made out against Mr. Bharti and noted that the legislation imposes a statutory bar on granting pre-arrest bail in such cases.

“...a case under the provisions of the SC/ST Act is prima facie made out against the applicant (Mr Bharti) and considering the statutory bar (on grant of bail) under the SC/ST Act, the present petition seeking grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed being not maintainable,” the court said.

Also Read | Delhi Police, Chandrashekhar Azad oppose in HC YouTuber’s anticipatory bail plea in SC/ST Act case

The court had reserved its order on September 16 after hearing arguments from Mr. Bharti’s counsel, the Delhi Police and Mr. Azad, who is also the chief of the Bhim Army.

Mr. Bharti had moved the High Court after a trial court rejected his anticipatory bail plea on September 7. Both the Delhi Police and Mr. Azad opposed his plea.

Mr. Azad had alleged in a complaint to the Delhi Police that Mr. Bharti made caste-based, abusive, derogatory and humiliating remarks against him, members of the Scheduled Caste community and B.R. Ambedkar on social media.

The FIR has been registered under provisions of the SC/ST Act, the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

The detailed order is awaited.

Published - September 24, 2026 04:36 pm IST

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Delhi HC rejects anticipatory bail plea of YouTuber in SC/ST Act case01024-09-2026
2Delhi High Court grants bail to Naga insurgent in money laundering case09.0224-09-2026
3‘Wild witch hunt’: Delhi HC rejects plea seeking FIR, probe against former HC judge Yashwant Varma07.321-09-2026
4Delhi High Court issues contempt notice to two men for releasing dogs on local commissioner07.8923-09-2026
5Delhi High Court dismisses plea seeking review of Parliament security framework05.0406-08-2026
6Delhi High Court seeks Centre’s response on gender disparity in Territorial Army012.8423-09-2026
7Суд в Москве отклонил жалобу на отказ СК возбудить дело после госпитализации Навального0022-03-2021
8Supreme Court says Delhi SIR notices seem ‘machine-generated’ and mechanically issued08.424-09-2026
9Labourers least paid in India, society does not value their physical work: Delhi HC09.4822-09-2026
10Delhi High Court seeks CARA response on plea to hand over custody of adopted son012.6822-09-2026

Классификация: Происшествия. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 6.72. Источник: www.thehindu.com.