You construct a galvanic cell using the two half cells below
$$\mathrm{Au^+(aq)+e^-\rightarrow Au(s)}$$
$$\mathrm{Cl_2(g)+2e^-\rightarrow 2Cl^-(aq)}$$
The initial concentration of ##\mathrm{Au^+}## is 0.10M and of ##\mathrm{Cl^-}## is 0.5M.
The initial pressure of ##\mathrm{Cl_2}## is 1.50atm at ##25^\circ\text{C}##.
Looking at the table above, we see that the top-to-bottom order is from largest to smallest standard cell potential.
Since gold, ie Au, is at the top, every other redox couple on the list has the ability to reduce a ##\mathrm{Au^+(aq)/Au(s)}## redox couple, including the redox couple ##\mathrm{Cl^-/Cl_2}##.
The cell
$$\mathrm{Cl^-(aq)|Cl_2(g)||Au^+(aq)|Au(s)}\tag{1}$$
has emf equal to ##1.69V-1.3583V=0.3317\text{V}##.
It appears we can use the Nernst equation.
$$E_{\text{cell}}=E_{\text{cell}}^\circ-\frac{RT}{n_RF}\ln{Q}\tag{2}$$
At ##\mathrm{298.15K}## we have that ##RT/F=0.025693\text{V}## and so
$$E_{cell}=E^\circ_{cell}-\frac{0.025693\text{V}}{n_r}\ln{Q}\tag{3}$$
So what is ##Q##?
It is the reaction quotient. But what is the reaction?
It seems we have the skeleton equation
$$\mathrm{2Cl^-(aq)+Au^+(aq)\rightarrow Cl_2(g)+Au(s)}\tag{4}$$
and (I am guessing) we need to balance it using a procedure I learned recently which includes the following intermediate steps
Balanced oxidation half-reaction:
$$\mathrm{Au^+(aq)+e^-\rightarrow Au(s)}\tag{5}$$
Balanced reduction half-reaction
$$\mathrm{2Cl^-(aq)\rightarrow Cl_2(g)+2e^-}\tag{6}$$
We multiple (5) by 2 and sum the result with (6) to get
$$\mathrm{2Au^+(aq)+2Cl^-(aq)\rightarrow Cl_2(g)+2Au(s)}\tag{7}$$
and the reaction quotient for this chemical reaction seems to be
$$Q=\mathrm{\frac{P_{Cl_2}}{[Au^+]^2[Cl^-]^2}}$$
Using the values given in the problem we find that
$$Q=\frac{1.52}{0.1^20.5^2}=607.95$$
Therefore
$$E_{cell}=0.3317\text{V}-\frac{0.025693\text{V}}{2}\ln{(607.95)}=0.25\text{V}\tag{8}$$
This matches the answer given on MIT OCW.
The first time I wrote this post, I made a mistake in equation (8). Instead of using ##n_r=2## I used ##n_r=1## and got an incorrect result.
Now that I have made this correct, I don't really have a question. I believe the steps above are all correct now.
Nope, you would get 0.34 V and the answer is 0.25 V.This is a case of you can subtract the Standard Action Potential's of the two and get the same result.![]()
Neither Au+, Cl- nor Cl2 are in the standard state, so the Nernst equation is a must (even if it is just a plug and chug kind of problem).
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pH calculation for MIT OCW galvanic cell problem | 0 | 10 | 03-06-2025 |
| 2 | Titration or galvanic cell for QLD year 12 chemistry IA2 | 0 | 30 | 01-02-2024 |
| 3 | Enthalpy of formation of benzene from combustion calorimetry | 0 | 7.66 | 01-08-2024 |
| 4 | Calculating moles from mass and molarity | 0 | 10 | 11-04-2024 |
| 5 | Ideal gas law calculation with oil column pressure | 0 | 10 | 28-04-2024 |
| 6 | Finding error in ideal gas law calculation for argon volume | 0 | 10 | 14-03-2024 |
| 7 | Why does stretching a rubber band at constant entropy increase its temperature? | 0 | 10 | 12-06-2024 |
| 8 | Video | 0 | 10 | 01-01-1970 |
| 9 | Images | 0 | 10 | 01-01-1970 |
| 10 | Why does the Kb method require extra steps for titration equivalence point? | 0 | 10 | 04-01-2025 |